Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The author defends civilian bombing by claiming it eventually pressured populations to stop fighting.
In plain terms
Bombing civilians is justified here because it supposedly made them demand peace.
What can you take from it?
Question ethical justifications for harm that claim long-term peace benefits.

Where it applies

  • war debates
  • military ethics
  • human rights discussions

Putting it to work

  • scrutinize war justifications
  • weigh civilian costs

Questions to consider

  • Can harm ever justify peace?
  • How do you measure wartime success?

Another view

The claim relies on unverified outcomes and ignores immediate suffering.

More from Abba Eban

  1. This refugee problem has been artificially maintained for political motives. Recent years have seen great expansion of Middle East economies, but the Arab gove…

    Permalink to quote #21
  2. International law is that law which the wicked do not obey and the righteous do not enforce.

    Permalink to quote #19
  3. '.. Israel is the product of the most sustained historic tenacity which the ages recall. The state of Israel is on immutable part of the international landscap…

    Permalink to quote #18

Related quotes

  1. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his …

    Ann CoulterAnn Coulter quote #13
  2. It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts…

    Winston ChurchillWinston Churchill quote #69
  3. The world has achieved brilliance without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, m…

    Omar BradleyOmar Bradley quote #1