The fact that we have not yet found the slightest evidence for life - much less intelligence - beyond this Earth does not surprise or disappoint me in the least. Our technology must still be laughably primitive, we may be like jungle savages listening for the throbbing of tom-toms while the ether around them carries more words per second than they could utter in a lifetime.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Clarke suggests humanity's lack of extraterrestrial contact reflects our technological immaturity rather than loneliness.
- In plain terms
- We haven't found aliens yet because our tech is too basic to detect them.
- What can you take from it?
- Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence when our tools are limited.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How might our current tools blind us to other forms of life?
- What counts as evidence for intelligence?
Another view
It assumes alien life exists and broadcasts signals we could theoretically detect.
More from Arthur C. Clarke
Reading computer manuals without the hardware is as frustrating as reading sex manuals without the software.
Permalink to quote #20 The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion.
Permalink to quote #22 I would defend the liberty of consenting adult creationists to practice whatever intellectual perversions they like in the privacy of their own homes; but it i…
Permalink to quote #19
Related quotes
Where are they?
Enrico FermiEnrico Fermi quote #3 The biggest breakthrough in the next 50 years will be the discovery of extraterrestrial life. We have been searching for it for 50 years and found nothing. Tha…
Freeman DysonFreeman Dyson quote #9 Perhaps the safest thing to do at the outset, if technology permits, is to send music. This language may be the best we have for explaining what we are like to…
Lewis ThomasLewis Thomas quote #3