The most distinguishing feature, or, at least, one of the most distinguishing features, of the great change effected in 1832 was that those who effected it at once abolished all the franchises as ancient as those of the Baronage of England; and, while they abolished them, they offered and proposed no substitute. The discontent upon the subject of representation which afterwards more or less pervaded our society dates from that period, and that discontent, all will admit, has ceased. It was terminated by the Act of Parliamentary Reform of 1867-8. That act was founded on a confidence that the great body of the people of this country were 'Conservative'. I use the word in its purest and loftiest sense. I mean that the people of England, and especially the working classes of England, are proud of belonging to a great country, and wish to maintain its greatness-that they are proud of belonging to an Imperial country, and are resolved to maintain, if they can, the empire of England-that they believe, on the whole, that the greatness and the empire of England are to be attributed to the ancient institutions of this country...There are people who may be, or who at least affect to be, working men, and who, no doubt, have a certain influence with a certain portion of the metropolitan working class, who talk Jacobinism...I say with confidence that the great body of the working class of England utterly repudiate such sentiments. They have no sympathy with them. They are English to the core. They repudiate cosmopolitan principles. They adhere to national principles. They are for maintaining the greatness of the kingdom and the empire, and they are proud of being subjects of our Sovereign and members of such an Empire. Well, then, as regards the political institutions of this country, the maintenance of which is one of the chief tenets of the Tory party, so far as I can read public opinion, the feeling of the nation is in accordance with the Tory party.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Political reforms can remove old rights without offering new ones, causing long-term discontent until later fixes.
- In plain terms
- Changing laws without replacing old systems creates anger until a new plan comes along.
- What can you take from it?
- Reforms need clear replacements to avoid lasting unrest.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is it okay to remove something before replacing it?
- How do you feel about political change?
Another view
Sometimes removing old systems is necessary even if no replacement is ready.
More from Benjamin Disraeli
Gentlemen, the Tory party, unless it is a national party, is nothing.
Permalink to quote #49 A university should be a place of light, of liberty, and of learning.
Permalink to quote #51 Gentlemen, I am a party man. I believe that, without party, Parliamentary government is impossible. I look upon Parliamentary government as the noblest governm…
Permalink to quote #48
Related quotes
During the last 100 years, the House of Lords has never contributed one iota to popular liberties or popular freedom, or done anything to advance the common we…
Joseph ChamberlainJoseph Chamberlain quote #1 Happily for the busy lunatics who rule over us, we are permanently the United States of Amnesia. We learn nothing because we remember nothing.
Gore VidalGore Vidal quote #42 The most dangerous moment for a bad government is when it begins to reform.
Alexis de TocquevilleAlexis de Tocqueville quote #87