Who is more humble? The scientist who looks at the universe with an open mind and accepts whatever the universe has to teach us, or somebody who says everything in this book must be considered the literal truth and never mind the fallibility of all the human beings involved?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Scientists are humble because they accept evidence, unlike those who demand literal truth.
- In plain terms
- Scientists are humble because they accept what is true.
- What can you take from it?
- Stay humble by accepting evidence over personal beliefs.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Who is truly humble?
- How do you know what is true?
Another view
Faith communities may argue this is a false comparison.
More from Carl Sagan
...that kind of skeptical questioning, don't accept what authority tells you -attitude of science- is also nearly identical to the attitude of mind necessary f…
Permalink to quote #7 I am convinced that there are genuine and valid levels of perception available with cannabis (and probably with other drugs) which are, through the defects of …
Permalink to quote #9 I try not to think with my gut. If I'm serious about understanding the world, thinking with anything besides my brain, as tempting as that might be, is likely …
Permalink to quote #6
Related quotes
Wir sein pettler. Hoc est verum.
Martin LutherMartin Luther quote #1 Animistic savages prostrating themselves before a painted stone have always seemed to me to be nearer the truth than any Einstein or Bertrand Russell.
Malcolm MuggeridgeMalcolm Muggeridge quote #5 The Religion that is afraid of science dishonours God and commits suicide. It acknowledges that it is not equal to the whole of truth, that it legislates, tyra…
Ralph Waldo EmersonRalph Waldo Emerson quote #32