A foreign policy aimed at the achievement of total security is the one thing I can think of that is entirely capable of bringing this country to a point where it will have no security at all. And a ruthless, reckless insistence on attempting to stamp out everything that could conceivably constitute a reflection of improper foreign influence in our national life, regardless of the actual damage it is doing to the cost of eliminating it, in terms of other American values, is the one thing I can think of that should reduce us all to a point where the very independence we are seeking to defend would be meaningless, for we would be doing things to ourselves as vicious and tyrannical as any that might be brought to us from outside. This sort of extremism seems to me to hold particular danger for a democracy, because it creates a curious area between what is held to be possible and what is really possible - an area within which government can always be plausibly shown to have been most dangerously delinquent in the performance of its tasks. And this area, where government is always deficient, provides the ideal field of opportunity for every sort of demagoguery and mischief-making. It constitutes a terrible breach in the dike of our national morale, through which forces of doubt and suspicion never cease to find entry. The heart of our problem, here, lies in our assessment of the relative importance of the various dangers among which we move; and until many of our people can be brought to understand the what we have to do is not to secure a total absence of danger but to balance peril against peril and to find the tolerable degree of each, we shall not wholly emerge from these confusions.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Kennan warns that seeking total security and purging all foreign influence harms democracy and independence more than external threats.
- In plain terms
- Trying to be completely safe and removing all foreign influence hurts democracy more than outside threats.
- What can you take from it?
- Avoid excessive security measures that harm liberty.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How much security is too much?
- Can you have both safety and freedom?
Another view
Some degree of vigilance is necessary for safety.
More from George F. Kennan
Now this problem of the adjustment of man to his natural resources, and the problem of how such things as industrialization and urbanization can be accepted wi…
Permalink to quote #3 I lived, particularly in childhood but with lessening intensity right on to middle age, in a world that was peculiarly and intimately my own, scarcely to be sh…
Permalink to quote #5 A political society does not live to conduct foreign policy; it would be more correct to say that it conducts foreign policy in order to live.
Permalink to quote #2
Related quotes
One thing I fear, that you Americans will do the same thing that you did after the last war. I mean that you will pull out of here and leave Europe, then Russi…
Hjalmar SchachtHjalmar Schacht quote #6 ...those hostilities were not very well contained, as we found out on September 11th, and so the notion that somehow policies that finally confront extremism a…
Condoleezza RiceCondoleezza Rice quote #28 If the Middle East remains a place where freedom does not flourish, it will remain a place of stagnation and anger and violence for export. And as we saw in th…
George W. BushGeorge W. Bush quote #323