Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The inability to deter a potential attacker, the immediacy of today's threats, and the magnitude of potential harm that could be caused by our adversaries' choice of weapons, do not permit that option.We cannot let our enemies strike first.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The speaker argues that new threats require proactive action rather than reactive defense.
- In plain terms
- We must act first because threats are too dangerous to wait on.
- What can you take from it?
- Proactive defense is needed against modern threats.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Is waiting ever safe?
- How do we define a threat?
Another view
Preemptive action can lead to unjustified conflict.
More from George W. Bush
This foreign policy stuff is a little frustrating.
Permalink to quote #90 I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.
Permalink to quote #92 And so, in my State of the- my State of the Union- or state- my speech to the nation, whatever you want to call it, speech to the nation- I asked Americans to …
Permalink to quote #89
Related quotes
But in terms of Saddam Hussein being there, let's remember that his country is divided, in effect. He does not control the northern part of his country. We are…
Condoleezza RiceCondoleezza Rice quote #3 We must recognize that there is no indication that Saddam Hussein has any intention of relenting. So we have an obligation of enormous consequence, an obligati…
John KerryJohn Kerry quote #4 Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has so…
John EdwardsJohn Edwards quote #7