If the next time our governments propose to make war on a helpless civilian population we were to uncover our grief and guilt instead of our anger, how much difference might we make?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Transforming anger into grief and guilt when governments propose war on civilians could create significant change.
- In plain terms
- Showing grief instead of anger might change how wars on civilians are viewed.
- What can you take from it?
- Emphasize human cost over rage to shift public opinion.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How does anger hinder peace efforts?
- What emotion drives change?
Another view
Grief might not mobilize people as effectively as anger.
More from Germaine Greer
We can put women on Prozac and they will think they are happy, even though they are not. Disturbed animals in the zoo are given Prozac too, which rather sugges…
Permalink to quote #38 In a sane society no woman would be left to struggle on her own with the huge transformation that is motherhood, when a single individual finds herself joined …
Permalink to quote #40 How you answer the question, whether individuals should be persuaded to live their whole lives in a state of chemical dependency, first upon contraceptive ster…
Permalink to quote #37
Related quotes
There can be no country or dignity without unity of the people, and there can be no unity without agreement, and there can be no agreement without conciliation…
Rene MoawadRene Moawad quote #1 There are many people who feel that it is useless and futile for us to continue talking peace and non-violence - against a government whose only reply is savag…
Nelson MandelaNelson Mandela quote #1 War is pillage versus resistance and if illusions of magnitude could be transmuted into ideals of magnanimity, peace might be realized.
Marianne MooreMarianne Moore quote #1