Skip to content
quotesby

Only the Christian Church can offer any rational objection to a complete confidence in the rich. For she has maintained from the beginning that the danger was not in man's environment, but in man. Further, she has maintained that if we come to talk of a dangerous environment, the most dangerous environment of all is the commodious environment. I know that the most modern manufacture has been really occupied in trying to produce an abnormally large needle. I know that the most recent biologists have been chiefly anxious to discover a very small camel. But if we diminish the camel to his smallest, or open the eye of the needle to its largest - if, in short, we assume the words of Christ to have meant the very least that they could mean, His words must at the very least mean this - that rich men are not very likely to be morally trustworthy. Christianity even when watered down is hot enough to boil all modern society to rags. The mere minimum of the Church would be a deadly ultimatum to the world. For the whole modern world is absolutely based on the assumption, not that the rich are necessary (which is tenable), but that the rich are trustworthy, which (for a Christian) is not tenable. You will hear everlastingly, in all discussions about newspapers, companies, aristocracies, or party politics, this argument that the rich man cannot be bribed. The fact is, of course, that the rich man is bribed; he has been bribed already. That is why he is a rich man. The whole case for Christianity is that a man who is dependent upon the luxuries of this life is a corrupt man, spiritually corrupt, politically corrupt, financially corrupt. There is one thing that Christ and all the Christian saints have said with a sort of savage monotony. They have said simply that to be rich is to be in peculiar danger of moral wreck. It is not demonstrably un-Christian to kill the rich as violators of definable justice. It is not demonstrably un-Christian to crown the rich as convenient rulers of society. It is not certainly un-Christian to rebel against the rich or to submit to the rich. But it is quite certainly un-Christian to trust the rich, to regard the rich as more morally safe than the poor.

Gilbert Keith Chesterton#129

SocietyMoralityPowerWealthEnvironment

About this quote

What does it mean?
Wealth creates moral danger regardless of environment, and comfort can corrupt character.
In plain terms
Riches risk morality more than poverty does.
What can you take from it?
Wealth can harm character regardless of conditions.

Where it applies

  • economic policy
  • personal finance
  • ethical leadership

Putting it to work

  • question wealth
  • check privilege

Questions to consider

  • Does money affect your choices?
  • How do you handle privilege?

Another view

Wealth can also enable good without corruption.

More from Gilbert Keith Chesterton

  1. Any one might say that we should be neither quite miserable nor quite happy. But to find out how far one MAY be quite miserable without making it impossible to…

    Permalink to quote #128
  2. Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly.

    Permalink to quote #130
  3. Take the case of courage. No quality has ever so much addled the brains and tangled the definitions of merely rational sages. Courage is almost a contradiction…

    Permalink to quote #127

Related quotes

  1. Fame, power, and gold, are loved for their own sakes - are worshipped with a blind, habitual idolatry. The pageantry of empire, and the fame of irresistible mi…

    Percy Bysshe ShelleyPercy Bysshe Shelley quote #205
  2. The world appears like a great family, Whose lord, oppressed with pride and poverty, (That to the few great bounty he may show) Is fain to starve the numerous …

    John, 2nd Earl of Rochester WilmotJohn, 2nd Earl of Rochester Wilmot quote #2
  3. When the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social importance, there will be great changes in the code of morals. We shall be able to rid ourselves of…

    John Maynard KeynesJohn Maynard Keynes quote #5