But when the good people do know, as they certainly do, that three million persons (at the least estimate) were starved to death in one year by the methods they approve, why do they still fraternize with the murderers and support the measures? Because they have been told that the lingering death of the three millions might ultimately benefit a greater number. The argument applies equally well to cannibalism.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- People support harmful policies if told they benefit a greater number, even at great cost.
- In plain terms
- People accept harm if told it helps more people later.
- What can you take from it?
- Question utilitarian justifications.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Is it right to sacrifice some for the many?
Another view
Some argue that saving many justifies difficult choices.
More from Isabel Paterson
The philanthropist, the politician, and the pimp are inevitably found in alliance because they have the same motives, they seek the same ends, to exist for, th…
Permalink to quote #7 The most dimwitted attempt at argument we've heard in this mortal world is the supposed retort to any advocate of freedom: 'Do you mean to be free to starve?' …
Permalink to quote #9 The humanitarian in theory is the terrorist in action.
Permalink to quote #6
Related quotes
The targeted assassination policy is a correct one. It is inconceivable that terrorists could operate freely without the ground quaking under their feet.
Amir PeretzAmir Peretz quote #1 The extravagant expenditure of public money is an evil not to be measured by the value of that money to the people who are taxed for it.
Chester A. ArthurChester A. Arthur quote #3 'Excuse me, I am not convinced.' (addressing U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld with regard to the Iraq War at the 39th Security Conference in Munich)
Joschka FischerJoschka Fischer quote #3