Ben Bova seems to work very hard at working in new discoveries into his Glum Future but alas, his future is glum and not that well written.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- An author tries to include new discoveries but the resulting future scenarios remain dull.
- In plain terms
- Including new facts does not make a bad story better.
- What can you take from it?
- Fact inclusion does not fix poor writing.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How do facts improve fiction?
- What makes a future story engaging?
Another view
The assessment relies on subjective taste about writing quality.
More from James Nicoll
Manitoba: Not sure what to do about them. Restock the province with megafauna and encourage tourism, I think. How quickly can we breed back the saber-toothed c…
Permalink to quote #27 I don't mind hidden depths but I insist that there be a surface.
Permalink to quote #29 Tor is the hard one. They employ a lot of editors, whose tastes vary. They don't always indicate who has edited what (on the choice of the editor, I think) so …
Permalink to quote #26
Related quotes
I repeat Sturgeon's Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who used the wors…
Theodore SturgeonTheodore Sturgeon quote #3 This was such bad writing that it was good.
William SaroyanWilliam Saroyan quote #35 The science fiction approach doesn't mean it's always about the future; it's an awareness that this is different.
Neal StephensonNeal Stephenson quote #1