My opposition lies in the fact that offhand answers have little value or grace of expression, and that such oral give and take helps to perpetuate the decline of the English language.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Thurber argues against offhand answers, claiming they degrade the English language.
- In plain terms
- Quick answers have poor grace and hurt language quality.
- What can you take from it?
- Avoid offhand answers to protect language.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Do casual chats matter?
- How do we save language?
Another view
It ignores the value of spontaneous conversation.
More from James Thurber
One (martini) is all right, two is too many, three is not enough.
Permalink to quote #57 The difference between our decadence and the Russians is that while theirs is brutal, ours is apathetic.
Permalink to quote #59 I'm 65 and I guess that puts me in with the geriatrics. But if there were fifteen months in every year, I'd only be 48. That's the trouble with us. We number e…
Permalink to quote #56
Related quotes
Ancient Indians had a far deeper confidence in living speech than in the moral, impersonal and derivative written communication. When words issued from the mou…
Robert T. OliverRobert T. Oliver quote #2 For an author to write as he speaks is just as reprehensible as the opposite fault, to speak as he writes; for this gives a pedantic effect to what he says, an…
Arthur SchopenhauerArthur Schopenhauer quote #68 If you smell what The Rock is cooking!
Dwayne (The Rock) JohnsonDwayne (The Rock) Johnson quote #1