It is often asserted that discussion is only possible between people who have a common language and accept common basic assumptions. I think that this is a mistake. All that is needed is a readiness to learn from one's partner in the discussion, which includes a genuine wish to understand what he intends to say. If this readiness is there, the discussion will be the more fruitful the more the partner's backgrounds differ.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Productive discussion needs willingness to learn, not shared language or assumptions.
- In plain terms
- You don't need to agree to have a good discussion.
- What can you take from it?
- Enter discussions ready to learn from differences.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Are you ready to learn or just to win?
- How can you understand someone with different background?
Another view
Some differences may be too deep to bridge through discussion alone.
More from Karl Popper
The history of science, like the history of all human ideas, is a history of irresponsible dreams, of obstinacy, and of error. But science is one of the very f…
Permalink to quote #40 It seems to me certain that more people are killed out of righteous stupidity than out of wickedness.
Permalink to quote #42 Science must begin with myths, and with the criticism of myths.
Permalink to quote #39
Related quotes
The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.
Joseph JoubertJoseph Joubert quote #59 On the contrary, it's because someone knows something about it that we can't talk about physics. It's the things that nobody knows about that we can discuss. W…
Richard FeynmanRichard Feynman quote #1 You can lead people to truth, but you can't make them understand it: the story of my youth, as seen from the present.
Bill WattersonBill Watterson quote #3