The British regulatory system was revised, so that bigger profits were encouraged, which removed the option of big spending on programming. Quality just fell off a cliff, and all the old hands either left or were fired for being too expensive.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Regulatory changes favored profit over quality, causing a decline in programming and staff cuts.
- In plain terms
- Profit‑driven regulation hurt TV quality and jobs.
- What can you take from it?
- Policy that prioritizes profit can degrade content quality.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Can profit motives coexist with high‑quality programming?
Another view
The claim assumes profit and quality are mutually exclusive.
More from Lee Child
Specifically, I was determined to avoid the hero-as-self-aware-damaged-person paradigm. I'm afraid as a reader I got sick of all the depressed and miserable al…
Permalink to quote #39 The stories are all very contemporary, but Reacher is an old-West character for sure. He could be a Zane Grey character. But the funny thing is, I didn't reall…
Permalink to quote #41 So, how to stay inside the world of entertainment without actually getting another job? I felt the only logical answer was to become a novelist. So I wrote the…
Permalink to quote #38
Related quotes
Obviously, crime pays, or there'd be no crime.
G. Gordon LiddyG. Gordon Liddy quote #1 'When we leave out people on the grounds of ethnicity we limit our options. As such, we become poorer because we are not making optimum use of our human resour…
Ratu Epeli GanilauRatu Epeli Ganilau quote #9 I am very interested in social developments in America. I believe that President Roosevelt has chosen the right path. We are dealing with the greatest social p…
Joseph GoebbelsJoseph Goebbels quote #22