I'm all in favor of the democratic principle that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line when someone takes the next step and concludes that two idiots are better than one genius.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Szilard critiques blind egalitarianism in decision-making, noting that while individual equality is a democratic ideal, aggregating ignorance does not create wisdom.
- In plain terms
- One person's equal vote is fine, but combining multiple unwise decisions does not make a good one.
- What can you take from it?
- Equality in voice does not guarantee quality in collective judgment.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When does majority rule become majority error?
- How do we value expertise in democratic systems?
Another view
The quote assumes a clear distinction between idiot and genius which may not exist in complex domains.
More from Leo Szilard
Don't lie if you don't have to.
Permalink to quote #9 If you want to succeed in the world, you don't have to be much cleverer than other people. You just have to be one day earlier.
Permalink to quote #11 A scientist's aim in a discussion with his colleagues is not to persuade, but to clarify.
Permalink to quote #8
Related quotes
Democracy can't work. Mathematicians, peasants, and animals, that's all there is - so democracy, a theory based on the assumption that mathematicians and peasa…
Robert A. HeinleinRobert A. Heinlein quote #35 The American, if he has a spark of national feeling, will be humiliated by the very prospect of a foreigner's visit to Congress - these, for the most part, ill…
Mary McCarthyMary McCarthy quote #2 The population of the US is nearly 300 million, including many of the best educated, most talented, most resourceful, humane people on earth. By almost any mea…
Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins quote #3