Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
Torvalds criticizes the ACPI standard as fundamentally flawed but acknowledges industry reliance forces its continued use. He directs extreme frustration at Intel engineers responsible for its design.
In plain terms
ACPI is broken but unavoidable, so he wishes harm on those who made it.
What can you take from it?
Legacy standards can persist despite poor design due to market lock-in.

Where it applies

  • discussing hardware compatibility
  • critiquing system firmware

Putting it to work

  • advocate for better standards
  • document technical debt

Questions to consider

  • When does frustration become unprofessional?
  • How do legacy standards hinder progress?

Another view

The quote uses hyperbolic violence that overshadows the legitimate technical critique.

More from Linus Torvalds

  1. Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.

    Permalink to quote #28
  2. There are literally several levels of SCO being wrong. And even if we were to live in that alternate universe where SCO would be right, they'd still be wrong.

    Permalink to quote #30
  3. Those that can, do. Those that can't, complain.

    Permalink to quote #27

Related quotes

  1. Think of it: the lowest common denominator in being digital is not your operating system, modem, or model of computer. It's a tiny piece of plastic, designed d…

    Nicholas NegroponteNicholas Negroponte quote #2
  2. The fact that ACPI was designed by a group of monkeys high on LSD, and is some of the worst designs in the industry obviously makes running it at _any_ point p…

    Linus TorvaldsLinus Torvalds quote #41
  3. EFI is this other Intel brain-damage (the first one being ACPI).

    Linus TorvaldsLinus Torvalds quote #50