I came in contact with every known Indian anarchist in London. Their bravery impressed me, but I felt that their zeal was misguided. I felt that violence was no remedy for India's ills, and that her civilisation required the use of a different and higher weapon for self-protection.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Indian anarchists in London were brave but their use of violence was misguided. Civilisation requires higher weapons like nonviolence for self-protection.
- In plain terms
- Bravery in violence is not enough; higher moral weapons are needed.
- What can you take from it?
- Use moral strength instead of violence for self-protection.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What tools are fit for self-protection?
- Can violence ever be a higher weapon?
Another view
Some argue that violent resistance is necessary when other options are blocked.
More from Mahatma Gandhi
Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary.
Permalink to quote #6 If India adopted the doctrine of love as an active part of her religion and introduced it in her politics. Swaraj would descent upon India from heaven. But I a…
Permalink to quote #8 You say that the magistrate's decision is unsatisfactory because it would enable a person, however unclean, to travel by a tram, and that even the Kaffirs woul…
Permalink to quote #5
Related quotes
Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed, and threw it at Henry- threw it to miss. The stone, that token of preposterous time, bounded five yards to Henry's rig…
William GoldingWilliam Golding quote #15 We have learned to tolerate the facts of war: that men are killed en masse - some twenty million in the Second World War - that whole cities and their inhabita…
Albert SchweitzerAlbert Schweitzer quote #52 ...society, with all its prisons and bayonets and whips and ostracisms and starvations, is powerless in the face of the Anarchist who is prepared to sacrifice …
George Bernard ShawGeorge Bernard Shaw quote #136