Nilsson and Pelger began with a flat retina atop a flat pigment layer and surmounted by a flat, protective transparent layer. The transparent layer was allowed to undergo localised random mutations of its refractive index. They then let the model deform itself at random, constrained only by the requirement that any change must be small and must be an improvement on what went before ... The results were swift and decisive. A trajectory of steadily mounting acuity led unhesitatingly from the flat beginning through a shallow indentation to a steadily deepening cup, as the shape of the model eye deformed itself on the computer screen. The transparent layer thickened to fill the cup and smoothly bulged its outer surface in a curve. And then, almost like a conjuring trick, a portion of this transparent filling condensed into a local, spherical subregion of higher refractive index. Not uniformly higher, but a gradient of refractive index such that the spherical region functioned as an excellent graded-index lens.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Computer models show that random mutations under natural selection can produce complex eyes quickly. This challenges the idea that such structures are too complex to evolve.
- In plain terms
- Simple random changes can build complex eyes over time naturally.
- What can you take from it?
- Complex structures can emerge through small incremental steps.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How do simple steps create complexity?
- Can complexity arise by chance?
Another view
The model simplifies the real evolutionary process.
More from Richard Dawkins
Thus the creationist's favourite question 'What is the use of half an eye?' Actually, this is a lightweight question, a doddle to answer. Half an eye is just 1…
Permalink to quote #103 But even with these conservative assumptions, the time taken to evolve a fish eye from flat skin was minuscule: fewer than 400,000 generations. For the kinds o…
Permalink to quote #105 I'm not a very good politician, and it doesn't really occur to me to think about what's the best way to achieve something politically. If you look at the histo…
Permalink to quote #102
Related quotes
It is natural human impulse to think of evolution as a long chain of improvements, of a never-ending advance towards largeness and complexity - in a word, towa…
Bill BrysonBill Bryson quote #49 ... it seems that it would take less than half a million years to evolve a good camera eye ... It's no wonder 'the' eye has evolved at least 40 times independe…
Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins quote #55 But even with these conservative assumptions, the time taken to evolve a fish eye from flat skin was minuscule: fewer than 400,000 generations. For the kinds o…
Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins quote #105