Scholars and artists thrown together are often annoyed at the puzzle of where they differ. Both work from knowledge; but I suspect they differ most importantly in the way their knowledge is come by. Scholars get theirs with conscientious thoroughness along projected lines of logic; poets theirs cavalierly and as it happens in and out of books. They stick to nothing deliberately, but let what will stick to them like burrs where they walk in the fields.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Scholars and poets differ in how they acquire knowledge—methodical versus spontaneous—yet both seek to grasp what sticks.
- In plain terms
- Scholars study systematically; poets absorb spontaneously.
- What can you take from it?
- Both disciplined study and open observation can yield insight.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How can scholars incorporate spontaneity?
- What can poets learn from rigor?
Another view
The contrast may oversimplify the overlap between disciplines.
More from Robert Frost
Like a piece of ice on a hot stove the poem must ride on its own melting...Read it a hundred times; it will forever keep its freshness as a metal keeps its fra…
Permalink to quote #108 Back out of all this now too much for us, Back in a time made simple by the loss Of detail, burned, dissolved, and broken off Like graveyard marble sculpture i…
Permalink to quote #110 No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader.
Permalink to quote #107
Related quotes
Art and science have their meeting point in method.
Paul DiracPaul Dirac quote #6 Science is feasible when the variables are few and can be enumerated; when their combinations are distinct and clear. We are tending toward the condition of sc…
Paul ValeryPaul Valery quote #8 He who has imagination without learning has wings but no feet.
Joseph JoubertJoseph Joubert quote #21