Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
Paul dismisses the argument that US troop presence caused a 1993 building bombing, saying that specific reasoning is invalid.
In plain terms
He rejects that causal link.
What can you take from it?
He challenges simplistic cause‑and‑effect claims.

Where it applies

  • debates
  • media analysis

Putting it to work

  • pointing out faulty reasoning in discussions

Questions to consider

  • What evidence is needed to prove causation?
  • How do we avoid oversimplified narratives?

Another view

Historical events often have multiple contributing factors.

More from Ron Paul

  1. The question serious supporters of a real war on terror must now ask is: will continuing the fight in Iraq help reverse this trend or cement it for decades to …

    Permalink to quote #99
  2. And then there's the libertarian Congressman Ron Paul who seems like your uncle the bartender who has a Big Theory about everything: some of his ideas are bril…

    Permalink to quote #101
  3. I thought Mayor Giuliani's intercession there was appropriate, and frankly, very, very excellent. I really appreciated it. Because we should never, never belie…

    Permalink to quote #98

Related quotes

  1. If Paulus's army had capitulated before the end, the Russians would have had the advantage of withdrawing forces against Paulus and against the southern front,…

    Erich von MansteinErich von Manstein quote #1
  2. In spite of intense efforts, the moment has drawn near when this front, already so heavily strained, will break. I consider it my duty to bring these conclusio…

    Gunther von KlugeGunther von Kluge quote #1
  3. We did not think that [Egyptian President] Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to Sinai on May 14 would not have been sufficient to launch an offensiv…

    Yitzhak RabinYitzhak Rabin quote #1