Skip to content
quotesby

I think stem cell research is crucial. I think medically it has a great future. I think that the answers aren't in yet. Some people say it's absolutely the answer, and others say it's no good and don't do it. It's not known yet, and I'll tell you what: politicians and bureaucrats and the FDA don't know either, and I don't think that's where it should be determined. It should be determined in the marketplace. In Washington so far we only had two choices, either prohibit it or subsidize it. My position is that we shouldn't do either. It should be in the states to devise the rules and laws on what you can do and can't do. Though I'm very strong pro-life and the worst thing I can conceive of is manufacturing babies to be used for research, but as an obstetrician I've had on quite a few occasions to do a surgery on a woman with a pregnancy in the Fallopian tube. And, the fetus is small, and alive, and the heart is beating, but if you don't operate on him, the fetus dies and the patient dies, because a hemorrhage is a very very critical time for ectopic pregnancy. I don't see any reason why you can't use that fetal tissue for research.

Ron Paul#78

PoliticsEthicsFederalismHealthcareRegulationResearch

About this quote

What does it mean?
Paul believes stem cell research should be decided by the market rather than politicians, and he opposes both prohibition and subsidies, while expressing personal pro-life concerns.
In plain terms
He wants stem cell rules set by states and the market, not the federal government.
What can you take from it?
Local, market-driven decisions may better balance innovation and ethics.

Where it applies

  • legislative debates on biomedical research
  • state policy formation

Putting it to work

  • advocating for state-level regulations
  • promoting private sector funding

Questions to consider

  • What are the risks of leaving medical research to market forces?
  • How can ethical concerns be addressed without federal oversight?

Another view

Market forces may not adequately protect vulnerable subjects or ensure equitable access.

More from Ron Paul

  1. John Stossel: Your party created a prescription drug program, you voted against it. Don't elderly people need these drugs? Ron Paul: Yeah, that's why I voted a…

    Permalink to quote #77
  2. Those who seek a pro-life culture must accept that we will never persuade all 300 million Americans to agree with us. A pro-life culture can be built only from…

    Permalink to quote #79
  3. Question: As a doctor, is it meaningful to you when somebody say that healthcare is a right, or that people have a right to good medical care? Ron Paul: That's…

    Permalink to quote #76

Related quotes

  1. Probably the greatest harm done by vast wealth is the harm that we of moderate means do ourselves when we let the vices of envy and hatred enter deep into our …

    Theodore RooseveltTheodore Roosevelt quote #10
  2. The corporate scandals of the last two years have shown us that we need to bring a new standard of openness to government and to business. I believe Wes Clark …

    Wesley ClarkWesley Clark quote #46
  3. You cannot have humane Zionism, it is a contradiction in terms.

    Israel ShahakIsrael Shahak quote #1