Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Mathematical models describe the universe but cannot explain why the universe exists. Science cannot answer why equations manifest into a reality.
- In plain terms
- Equations describe the universe but can't explain why it exists.
- What can you take from it?
- Recognize science's limits in explaining existence itself.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Why does anything exist?
- What is beyond science?
Another view
Science may not answer existential questions.
More from Stephen Hawking
Maybe that is our mistake: maybe there are no particle positions and velocities, but only waves. It is just that we try to fit the waves to our preconceived id…
Permalink to quote #33 If we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosop…
Permalink to quote #35 Just like a computer, we must remember things in the order in which entropy increases. This makes the second law of thermodynamics almost trivial. Disorder inc…
Permalink to quote #32
Related quotes
Where are they?
Enrico FermiEnrico Fermi quote #3 The more I examine the universe and the details of its architecture, the more evidence I find that the universe in some sense must have known we were coming.
Freeman DysonFreeman Dyson quote #3 The fact that life evolved out of nearly nothing, some 10 billion years after the universe evolved out of literally nothing, is a fact so staggering that I wou…
Richard DawkinsRichard Dawkins quote #5