Self-interest, or rather self-love, or egoism, has been more plausibly substituted as the basis of morality. But I consider our relations with others as constituting the boundaries of morality. With ourselves, we stand on the ground of identity, not of relation, which last, requiring two subjects, excludes self-love confined to a single one. To ourselves, in strict language, we can owe no duties, obligation requiring also two parties. Self-love, therefore, is no part of morality. Indeed, it is exactly its counterpart.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Jefferson argues morality requires relations between two parties, making self-love its counterpart rather than a moral foundation.
- In plain terms
- Morality involves duties to others, not just love of oneself.
- What can you take from it?
- Duty requires another person to be meaningful.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Is morality social or individual?
- Can you owe duties to yourself?
Another view
Some ethical systems do prioritize self-care as a virtue.
More from Thomas Jefferson
I am really mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, a fact like this can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too, as an of…
Permalink to quote #78 I cannot live without books.
Permalink to quote #80 I agree ... that a professorship of Theology should have no place in our institution. But we cannot always do what is absolutely best. Those with whom we act, …
Permalink to quote #77
Related quotes
Happiness and moral duty are inseparably connected.
George WashingtonGeorge Washington quote #83 Virtue is its own reward.
Ancius BoethiusAncius Boethius quote #1 I would never have surrendered, because of my pledge as a German officer. But when Hitler died, that pledge ended. By killing himself, Hitler saved thousands o…
Otto SkorzenyOtto Skorzeny quote #2