Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The author claims Engels’ writings are nonsense and that scientific institutions should correct his errors.
In plain terms
Engels’ work is seen as nonsense that needs correction by science.
What can you take from it?
Engels’ ideas are considered flawed and require scientific rebuttal.

Where it applies

  • academic seminars
  • philosophy courses

Putting it to work

  • publishing critiques
  • re‑examining historical texts

Questions to consider

  • How should we treat historical thinkers with outdated ideas?
  • Is total dismissal justified?

Another view

Engels contributed to Marxist theory, which some view as historically significant despite flaws.

More from Aleksandr Zinovyev

  1. Marxism emerged not only with the intention of explaining scientifically everything in the world, but in addition to this, as a representative of the 'hurt and…

    Permalink to quote #3
  2. One physicist writes a study on microphysics, but another writes a book on the importance of Lenin's and Engels' works for the development of physics; one math…

    Permalink to quote #5
  3. I consider him [i.e Stalin] one of the greatest persons in the history of mankind. In the history of Russia he was, in my opinion, even greater than Lenin. Unt…

    Permalink to quote #2

Related quotes

  1. The only thing that stops God sending a second Flood is that the first one was useless.

    Nicolas ChamfortNicolas Chamfort quote #2
  2. Philosophy is based on speculation, on logic, on thought, on the synthesis of what we know and on the analysis of what we do not know. Philosophy must include …

    P. D. OuspenskyP. D. Ouspensky quote #4
  3. It is true that numerous instances are not always necessary to establish a law, provided the essential and relevant circumstances can easily be disentangled. B…

    Bertrand RussellBertrand Russell quote #6