Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The quote states that language (words) does not equate to the actual objects or concepts they refer to.
In plain terms
Words are not the things they name.
What can you take from it?
Distinguish between symbols and their referents.

Where it applies

  • communication
  • education

Putting it to work

  • critical reading
  • teaching language

Questions to consider

  • How does this affect how we interpret texts?
  • When might words closely match their referent?

Another view

The statement can be overly simplistic for complex linguistic theory.

More from Alfred Korzybski

  1. Any organism must be treated as-a-whole; in other words, that an organism is not an algebraic sum, a linear function of its elements, but always more than that…

    Permalink to quote #2
  2. If we consider that all we deal with represents constantly changing sub-microscopic, interrelated processes which are not, and cannot be 'identical with themse…

    Permalink to quote #3
  3. The only link between the verbal and objective world is exclusively structural, necessitating the conclusion that the only content of all 'knowledge' is struct…

    Permalink to quote #4

Related quotes

  1. In the revolt against idealism, the ambiguities of the word 'experience' have been perceived, with the result that realists have more and more avoided the word…

    Bertrand RussellBertrand Russell quote #9
  2. Let us repeat the two crucial negative premises as established firmly by all human experience: (1) Words are not the things we are speaking about; and (2) Ther…

    Alfred KorzybskiAlfred Korzybski quote #16
  3. We should not be surprised that we find meaningless noises in the foundation of many old 'philosophies', and that from them arise most of the old 'philosophica…

    Alfred KorzybskiAlfred Korzybski quote #22