At the first stages of negotiations, we will not release prisoners with blood on their hands. However, as part of a final agreement, I do not rule out this option. Offering hope for a better future is more important than grieving the past.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Initially we won’t release violent prisoners, but we may consider it later; hope for the future outweighs past grief.
- In plain terms
- We’ll keep prisoners now but might release them later; focusing on future hope is more important.
- What can you take from it?
- Balance justice with reconciliation, emphasizing hope.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is amnesty appropriate?
- How can hope be cultivated without ignoring past harm?
Another view
Releasing violent offenders can risk public safety.
More from Amir Peretz
The targeted assassination policy is a correct one. It is inconceivable that terrorists could operate freely without the ground quaking under their feet.
Permalink to quote #1 When my mother delivered me, she didn't have milk, and I was breastfed by an Arab woman. Maybe that had an effect on my leftist views.
Permalink to quote #3 If a labor leader of national scale is arrested by the police, I will call a general strike.
Permalink to quote #4
Related quotes
Entre los Individuos, como entre Las Naciones, El respeto al derecho ajeno es la paz.
Benito JuarezBenito Juarez quote #1 Accordingly, death is a harbor of peace for the just, but is believed a shipwreck for the wicked.
AmbroseAmbrose quote #1 O little town of Bethlehem, How still we see thee lie! Above thy deep and dreamless sleep The silent stars go by; Yet in thy dark streets shineth The everlasti…
Phillips BrooksPhillips Brooks quote #1