Fermat couldn't possibly have had this proof.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Wiles doubts Fermat possessed the actual proof he claimed to have.
- In plain terms
- Fermat probably did not have the proof he said he did.
- What can you take from it?
- Historical claims often lack verification.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Why do we trust historical claims?
- How do we verify old ideas?
Another view
Absence of evidence is not proof of absence.
More from Andrew Wiles
Young children simply aren't interested in Fermat. They just want to hear a story and they're not going to let you do anything else.
Permalink to quote #8 I don't believe Fermat had a proof. I think he fooled himself into thinking he had a proof.
Permalink to quote #10 I really believed that I was on the right track, but that did not mean that I would necessarily reach my goal.
Permalink to quote #7
Related quotes
I am acutely aware of the fact that the marriage between mathematics and physics, which was so enormously fruitful in past centuries, has recently ended in div…
Freeman DysonFreeman Dyson quote #1 The problem of distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers and of resolving the latter into their prime factors is known to be one of the most importan…
Carl Friedrich GaussCarl Friedrich Gauss quote #1 Quaternions came from Hamilton after his really good work had been done, and though beautifully ingenious, have been an unmixed evil to those who have touched …
Lord KelvinLord Kelvin quote #3