Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The speaker contrasts past enemies described as sane white men with current enemies described as insane savages.
In plain terms
Old enemies were described as rational while current ones are called irrational savages.
What can you take from it?
Dehumanizing language shapes public perception of conflict.

Where it applies

  • war propaganda
  • political rhetoric
  • news commentary

Putting it to work

  • enemy characterization
  • rhetorical analysis

Questions to consider

  • How does language affect war support?
  • What defines a reasonable enemy?

Another view

This comparison uses racially charged language that ignores enemy complexity.

More from Ann Coulter

  1. I was not enthusiastic about the last Gulf war. Of course, it goes without saying, I rooted for our team once the shooting started. But I wasn't for that war. …

    Permalink to quote #42
  2. : as for catching Osama, it's irrelevant. Things are going swimmingly in Afghanistan.

    Permalink to quote #44
  3. I'd build a wall. In fact, I'd hire illegal immigrants to build the wall. And throw out the illegals who are here. [...] It's cheap labor.

    Permalink to quote #41

Related quotes

  1. I rarely saw them as individuals. It was always a huge mass...they were naked, packed together, running, being driven with whips.

    Franz StanglFranz Stangl quote #2
  2. If you listen to them, every German is a monster.

    Joachim von RibbentropJoachim von Ribbentrop quote #4
  3. No attempt of any kind must be made at rescuing members of ships sunk, and this includes picking up persons in the water and putting them in lifeboats, rightin…

    Karl DonitzKarl Donitz quote #1