Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
Relying on old precedents to justify major changes is trivial and weak.
In plain terms
He compares big ideas to tiny old examples, like engines to kettles.
What can you take from it?
Don't justify big reforms with trivial past examples.

Where it applies

  • policy debate
  • legal argument
  • political rhetoric

Putting it to work

  • Critique weak analogies in debate
  • Demand substantive justification for change

Questions to consider

  • Can old examples justify new changes?
  • Is tradition a valid guide for policy?

Another view

Sometimes precedents provide necessary stability for large changes.

More from Benjamin Disraeli

  1. It is well-known what a middleman is: he is a man who bamboozles one party and plunders the other.

    Permalink to quote #12
  2. Things must be done by parties, not by persons using parties as tools.

    Permalink to quote #14
  3. Protection is not a principle, but an expedient.

    Permalink to quote #11

Related quotes

  1. 'Logic is invincible because in order to combat logic it is necessary to use logic.'

    Pierre BoutrouxPierre Boutroux quote #1
  2. I for one hope that some of the standards of the old world carry over. (February 2005)

    David GergenDavid Gergen quote #2
  3. He was in LOGIC a great critic, Profoundly skill'd in analytic; He could distinguish, and divide A hair 'twixt south, and south-west side: On either which he w…

    Samuel ButlerSamuel Butler quote #3