One of the objections I have against Campbell's Astounding was that there was too little love in it. It was a very loveless magazine. They never took enough account of the feeling that is always in SF.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The author critiques a sci-fi magazine for neglecting emotional depth and human feelings in its stories.
- In plain terms
- I thought the magazine was too focused on ideas and ignored the feelings of people.
- What can you take from it?
- Science fiction needs emotional depth to resonate with readers.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Should sci-fi focus more on emotion?
- What makes a story relatable?
Another view
Technical concepts can sometimes overshadow character development in speculative fiction.
More from Brian Aldiss
Most SF is about madness, or what is currently ruled to be madness; this is part of its attraction - it's always playing with how much the human mind can encom…
Permalink to quote #6 When childhood dies, its corpses are called adults and they enter society, one of the politer names of hell. That is why we dread children, even if we love the…
Permalink to quote #8 Keep violence in the mind where it belongs.
Permalink to quote #5
Related quotes
A splendid muse of fiction hath Charles Dickens, But now and then just as the interest thickens He stilts his pathos, and the reader sickens.
Charles DickensCharles Dickens quote #148 I have long felt that any reviewer who expresses rage and loathing for a novel is preposterous. He or she is like a person who has put on full armor and attack…
Kurt VonnegutKurt Vonnegut quote #226 The science fiction approach doesn't mean it's always about the future; it's an awareness that this is different.
Neal StephensonNeal Stephenson quote #1