I have long felt that any reviewer who expresses rage and loathing for a novel is preposterous. He or she is like a person who has put on full armor and attacked a hot fudge sundae or a banana split.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Vonnegut mocks literary reviewers who express extreme hatred for novels, comparing their aggression to attacking something harmless and sweet.
- In plain terms
- Getting extremely angry about a book is as silly as attacking a dessert.
- What can you take from it?
- Literary criticism should avoid disproportionate anger over harmless art.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Should art be attacked?
- How should we respond to disliked books?
Another view
It dismisses the validity of strong negative reactions to powerful art.
More from Kurt Vonnegut
We've sure come a long way since then. Sometimes I wish we hadn't. I hate H-bombs and the Jerry Springer show.
Permalink to quote #225 When I write, I feel like an armless, legless man with a crayon in his mouth.
Permalink to quote #227 It is almost always a mistake to mention Abraham Lincoln. He always steals the show.
Permalink to quote #224
Related quotes
One of the objections I have against Campbell's Astounding was that there was too little love in it. It was a very loveless magazine. They never took enough ac…
Brian AldissBrian Aldiss quote #7 It is possible that the malice of writers has been overrated (by myself among others). Reading their ruminations on their craft, one sees why this writer could…
Wilfrid SheedWilfrid Sheed quote #26 Some say the Great American Novel is 'Huckleberry Finn,' some say it's 'The Jungle,' some say it's 'The Great Gatsby.' But my vote goes to the tale with the ma…
Vladimir NabokovVladimir Nabokov quote #31