We may yet work up to some serious shooting war, or maybe some acts of urban genocide committed with rogue nuclear weapons. But if that were the case, why would we call that '9/11'? If Washington disappeared in a mushroom cloud, we'd give that huge event a different name.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Future catastrophic events might be named differently than current terror attacks. Naming depends on the scale and nature of destruction.
- In plain terms
- If the damage were bigger, we would call it something else.
- What can you take from it?
- Labels depend on the scale of disaster.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Does a name change how we view an event?
- What makes an event historical?
Another view
Naming conventions may not always fit reality.
More from Bruce Sterling
We indeed see the globe caught up in a 'new kind of world war,' but what kind is it? Veterans of World War One and Two would have to shake their heads at a 'wa…
Permalink to quote #59 We might be on the brink of an apocalypse if, instead of poor people with suicide bombs killing middle class guys, middle-class people with suicide bombs start…
Permalink to quote #61 War as Napoleon knew it just not possible any more. However, we're very unlikely to accept or recognize 'world peace' even when we get it.
Permalink to quote #58
Related quotes
The event that came to be known as The Pulse began at 3:03 p.m., eastern standard time, on the afternoon of October 1. The term was a misnomer, of course, but …
Stephen KingStephen King quote #132 I hate the way they portray us in the media. You see a black family, it says, 'They're looting.' You see a white family, it says, 'They're looking for food.' A…
Kanye WestKanye West quote #3 The medium is the message.
Marshall McLuhanMarshall McLuhan quote #3