Dave always arrives at the right conclusions, but his mathematics is terrible. I take it home and find all sorts of errors and then have to spend the night trying to develop the correct proof. But in the end, the result is always exactly the same as the one Dave saw directly.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Dave reaches correct conclusions despite flawed math, suggesting intuition or pattern recognition works beyond formal steps.
- In plain terms
- Sometimes the answer is right even if the steps to get there are wrong.
- What can you take from it?
- Trust intuition but verify the math.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When have I guessed right but explained wrong?
- How do I balance intuition and rigor?
Another view
Intuition without proof can lead to repeated errors in complex systems.
More from David Bohm
The universe according to Bohm actually has two faces, or more precisely, two orders. One is the explicate order, corresponding to the physical world as we kno…
Permalink to quote #30 What is essential here is the presence of the spirit of dialogue, which is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primar…
Permalink to quote #29 A key difference between a dialogue and an ordinary discussion is that, within the latter people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of …
Permalink to quote #28
Related quotes
I am acutely aware of the fact that the marriage between mathematics and physics, which was so enormously fruitful in past centuries, has recently ended in div…
Freeman DysonFreeman Dyson quote #1 Mathematics is the key and door to the sciences.
Galileo GalileiGalileo Galilei quote #19 In our time, in the period 1960-1980, we have seen particle physics emerge as the playground of group theory.
Freeman DysonFreeman Dyson quote #49