He had the haughtiness of Henry the Eighth, without his spirit; the avarice of Henry the Seventh, without his exactions; the indignities of Charles the First, without his bigotry for his prerogative; the vexations of King William, with as little skill in the management of parties; and the gross gallantry of his father, without his goodnature or his honesty:- he might, perhaps, have been honest, if he had never hated his father, or had ever loved his son.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- He compares a ruler to several historical kings, noting he has their flaws without their virtues, and suggests honesty might have been possible without familial hatred.
- In plain terms
- He says the ruler mixes bad traits of past kings and lacks their good ones.
- What can you take from it?
- The ruler is a flawed blend of historical monarchs.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How effective is comparing leaders across eras?
- Can personal feelings truly hinder honest governance?
Another view
The analogy is broad and may oversimplify complex governance issues.
More from George II of Great Britain
If he is mad, so much the better; and if he is mad, I hope to God he'll bite some of my generals.
Permalink to quote #3 I hate bainting, and boetry too! Neither the one nor the other ever did any good.
Permalink to quote #2 Non, j'aurai des maitresses.
Permalink to quote #1
Related quotes
Douglas, Douglas, you would make Neville Chamberlain look like a warmonger.
Margaret ThatcherMargaret Thatcher quote #57 When you have sweated, toiled, had mad dreams, hopeless nightmares, you find yourself in London's streets, cold and dank in the night air. Think - what have I …
Michael CollinsMichael Collins quote #1 Stalin's methods did not help.
Anastas MikoyanAnastas Mikoyan quote #1