Thus, for example, tanks, battleships and bombing planes are inherently tyrannical weapons, while rifles, muskets, long-bows, and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon - so long as there is no answer to it - gives claws to the weak.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Simple weapons empower the weak, while complex weapons amplify the strong.
- In plain terms
- Simple weapons help the weak; complex weapons help the strong.
- What can you take from it?
- Technology’s complexity influences power dynamics.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Can any weapon be truly neutral?
- How does technology shape power today?
Another view
The classification of weapons as 'inherently' democratic or tyrannical oversimplifies history.
More from George Orwell
Autobiography is only to be trusted when it reveals something disgraceful. A man who gives a good account of himself is probably lying, since any life when vie…
Permalink to quote #17 : in a state which was at once unconquerable and in a permanent state of 'cold war' with its neighbours.[Commonly cited as the first documented use of the phra…
Permalink to quote #19 Circus dogs jump when the trainer cracks his whip, but the really well-trained dog is the one that turns his somersault when there is no whip.
Permalink to quote #16
Related quotes
No entanto a Inglaterra goza por algum tempo a com a certeza de ter de recomecar daqui a dez anos ou quinze anos; porque nem pode conquistar e anexar um vasto …
Jose Maria Eca de QueirozJose Maria Eca de Queiroz quote #10 That man always made it a point to speak German, although he spoke English well enough. That was because he imitated Hitler to the last degree. He would say th…
Joachim von RibbentropJoachim von Ribbentrop quote #14 Next time round Hitler will be a machine.
Germaine GreerGermaine Greer quote #24