As for science and religion, the known and admitted facts are few and plain enough. All that the parsons say is unproved. All that the doctors say is disproved. That's the only difference between science and religion there's ever been, or will be.

Either criticism is no good at all (a very defensible position) or else criticism means saying about an author the very things that would have made him jump ou…

The academic mind reflects infinity, and is full of light by the simple process of being shallow and standing still.

The whole difference between construction and creation is exactly this: that a thing constructed can only be loved after it is constructed; but a thing created…

The creationist is a sham religious person who, curiously, has no true sense of religion. In the language of religion, it is the facts we observe in the world …

'If we are honest-and scientists have to be-we must admit that religion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. The very idea of God is a pr…

The puritanic potentialities of science have never been forecast. If it evolves a body of organized rites, and is established as a religion, hierarchically org…