It was his peculiar doctrine that a man has a perfect right to interfere by force with the slaveholder, in order to rescue the slave. I agree with him. They who are continually shocked by slavery have some right to be shocked by the violent death of the slaveholder, but no others.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Violent resistance against slaveholders is justified to rescue slaves, though only those shocked by slavery may feel such right.
- In plain terms
- Forceful action against slavery is morally permissible for the outraged.
- What can you take from it?
- Moral outrage can legitimize direct intervention.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- When is violent resistance justified?
- What alternatives exist to force?
Another view
Violence can escalate conflict and cause collateral harm.
More from Henry David Thoreau
I hear many condemn these men because they were so few. When were the good and the brave ever in a majority? Would you have had him wait till that time came? -…
Permalink to quote #116 I speak for the slave when I say that I prefer the philanthropy of Captain Brown to that philanthropy which neither shoots me nor liberates me.
Permalink to quote #118 He would have left a Greek accent slanting the wrong way, and righted up a falling man.
Permalink to quote #115
Related quotes
Slaves no doubt, but still men.
Ambrosius Theodosius MacrobiusAmbrosius Theodosius Macrobius quote #1 The men and women of the North are slaveholders, those of the South slaveowners. The guilt rests on the North equally with the South.
Susan B. AnthonySusan B. Anthony quote #2 I was an idealist in my profession. If I used such expression as 'Jewish bastard' or 'Jewish sow,' it simply meant that this official language had become so mu…
Heinrich BaabHeinrich Baab quote #2