... for Davies and Service, it was the end of two brilliant careers. For the country they served, it would have even darker implications because they were the best of an era, and the Foreign Service does not produce that many men of rare excellence.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The loss of exceptional diplomats harms the country more than losing individuals.
- In plain terms
- Losing exceptional diplomats hurts the country more than just losing individuals.
- What can you take from it?
- Top talent is hard to replace and vital for national service.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- How do we identify rare excellence?
- What happens when it leaves?
Another view
One person rarely determines national outcomes alone.
More from John P. Davies
Going back to Davies, at the time after the war that Davies was a member of the policy staff of the State Department, he had advised (this was under Dulles), t…
Permalink to quote #4 [Davies] was one of the finest observers of oriental countries that we ever had.
Permalink to quote #6 The crime he did commit was that of practical, complicated, and nuanced thought. Though an ardent anti-communist, he also knew that Chiang's regime was bankrup…
Permalink to quote #3
Related quotes
Buddy Holly was twenty-two. Think of what he might have gone on to achieve. I mean, if Beethoven had been killed in a plane crash at twenty-two, the history of…
Tom StoppardTom Stoppard quote #34 It is not what they built. It is what they knocked down. It is not the houses. It is the spaces between the houses. It is not the streets that exist. It is the…
James FentonJames Fenton quote #1 All political decisions are taken under great pressure, and if a treaty serves its turn for ten or twenty years, the wisdom of its framers is sufficiently conf…
Herbert FisherHerbert Fisher quote #1