The concept of 'measurement' becomes so fuzzy on reflection that it is quite surprising to have it appearing in physical theory at the most fundamental level... does not any analysis of measurement require concepts more fundamental than measurement? And should not the fundamental theory be about these more fundamental concepts?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Bell questions whether measurement concepts in physics require more fundamental underlying concepts.
- In plain terms
- Measurement in physics might rely on concepts more basic than measurement itself.
- What can you take from it?
- Fundamental theory should explain measurement, not assume it.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What precedes measurement?
- Can we measure without concepts?
Another view
Some theories may not require deeper concepts.
More from John Stewart Bell
Theoretical physicists live in a classical world, looking out into a quantum-mechanical world. The latter we describe only subjectively, in terms of procedures…
Permalink to quote #1 While the founding fathers agonized over the question 'particle' or 'wave', de Broglie in 1925 proposed the obvious answer 'particle' and 'wave'. Is it not cle…
Permalink to quote #3 Is it not good to know what follows from what, even if it is not necessarily FAPP? [FAPP is Bell's suggested abbreviation of 'for all practical purposes.'] Sup…
Permalink to quote #4
Related quotes
The theory community, myself included - became rather troubled about the particle.
Bob JaffeBob Jaffe quote #1 The more precise the measurement of position, the more imprecise the measurement of momentum, and vice versa. In the most extreme case, absolute precision of o…
Werner HeisenbergWerner Heisenberg quote #1 Think, for a moment, of a cheetah, a sleek, beautiful animal, one of the fastest on earth, which roams freely on the savannas of Africa. In its natural habitat…
Peter FreundPeter Freund quote #1