Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The author expresses strong disdain for philosophy and the profession of teaching it, suggesting most practitioners lack valuable insights.
In plain terms
He dislikes talking about philosophy and thinks teaching it is pointless because most philosophers have nothing important to say.
What can you take from it?
Avoid engaging with fields where practitioners often lack substance.

Where it applies

  • academic debates
  • career choices
  • intellectual circles

Putting it to work

  • evaluate fields by output
  • critique academia
  • seek substance

Questions to consider

  • How do you judge the value of a profession?
  • Is all academic work useful?

Another view

Dismissal may overlook valuable contributions from serious philosophers.

More from Karl Popper

  1. It seems to me that I may be living too long. Indeed: my nearest relations have all died, and so have some of my best friends, and even some of my best pupils.…

    Permalink to quote #9
  2. I appeal to the philosophers of all countries to unite and never again mention Heidegger or talk to another philosopher who defends Heidegger. This man was a d…

    Permalink to quote #11
  3. Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification - the art of discerning what we may with advantage omit.

    Permalink to quote #8

Related quotes

  1. Tis impossible to avail our selves of the genuine Powers of Eloquence, without examining in their Elements and first Principles, the Force and Harmony of Numbe…

    John AdamsJohn Adams quote #1
  2. 'My four years at Berkley represent two of the happiest weeks of my life.'

    Michael MedvedMichael Medved quote #1
  3. First come I; my name is Jowett. There's no knowledge but I know it. I am master of this college: What I don't know isn't knowledge.

    Henry Charles BeechingHenry Charles Beeching quote #1