As so often in Indo-Pakistani and Hindu-Muslim comparisons, the argument is reminiscent of the inequality between the contenders in the Cold War: you could demonstrate for disarmament in the West, but to demonstrate for this in the East Bloc (except if it were for unilateral disarmament by the Western 'war-mongers') would have put you in trouble.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The author compares Hindu-Muslim debates to Cold War dynamics where free speech differed by region.
- In plain terms
- Talking about religion in some places is harder than in others.
- What can you take from it?
- Free expression depends on political context.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Where can you speak freely?
- What are the risks?
Another view
The Cold War analogy might not fit modern religious debates perfectly.
More from Koenraad Elst
While one should always be vigilant for traces of totalitarianism in any ideology or movement, the obsession with fascism in the anti-Hindu rhetoric of the sec…
Permalink to quote #6 The neologism adivasi constitutes one of the most successful disinformation campaigns in modern history.
Permalink to quote #8 'the essence of Hindu Dharma is not 'tolerance' or 'equal respect for all religious' but satya, truth. The problem with Christianity and Islam is superficially…
Permalink to quote #5
Related quotes
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Evelyn Beatrice HallEvelyn Beatrice Hall quote #1 A function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purposes when it induces a condition of unrest…
William O. DouglasWilliam O. Douglas quote #25 Strange it is, that men should admit the validity of the arguments for free discussion, but object to their being 'pushed to an extreme'; not seeing that unles…
John Stuart MillJohn Stuart Mill quote #28