16) There is no cause so right that one cannot find a fool following it. To prove a point, one may seek out a foolish Socialist, thirteenth century Liberal, Scientologist, High Frontier advocate, Mensa member, science fiction fan, Jim Bakker acolyte, Christian, witch, or fanatical devotee of Special Interest Lib. It doesn't really reflect on the cause itself. Ad hominem argument saves time, but it's still a fallacy.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Every cause has foolish followers, so attacking them does not invalidate the cause itself.
- In plain terms
- Don't judge a cause by its stupid supporters.
- What can you take from it?
- Avoid ad hominem fallacies when debating ideas.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Can a cause be good if followers are bad?
- How do you argue without attacking?
Another view
Sometimes the behavior of followers can reflect poorly on the leadership.
More from Larry Niven
11) There is a time and place for tact. And there are times when tact is entirely misplaced.
Permalink to quote #49 17) No technique works if it isn't used.
Permalink to quote #51 10) Anarchy is the least stable of social structures.
Permalink to quote #48
Related quotes
Metaphysics is the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct; but to find these reasons is no less an instinct.
F. H. BradleyF. H. Bradley quote #2 I may not be smart enough to debate you point-for-point on this, but I have the feeling about 60% of what you say is crap.
David LettermanDavid Letterman quote #4 Logician: A cat has four paws. Old Gentleman: My dog had four paws. Logician: Then it's a cat. Old Gentleman: So my dog is a cat? Logician: And the contrary is…
Eugene IonescoEugene Ionesco quote #5