For a parallel to the lesson of atomic theory regarding the limited applicability of such customary idealisations, we must in fact turn to quite other branches of science, such as psychology, or even to that kind of epistemological problems with which already thinkers like Buddha and Lao Tzu have been confronted, when trying to harmonize our position as spectators and actors in the great drama of existence.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- The limits of scientific idealization connect to ancient philosophical problems about being both observers and participants.
- In plain terms
- Scientific limits match old philosophical questions about observing and acting.
- What can you take from it?
- Look to philosophy for scientific insights.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What can science learn from philosophy?
- How do we balance observing and acting?
Another view
It assumes ancient wisdom applies directly to modern science.
More from Niels Bohr
What is it that we humans depend on? We depend on our words... Our task is to communicate experience and ideas to others. We must strive continually to extend …
Permalink to quote #4 We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.
Permalink to quote #6 Isolated material particles are abstractions, their properties being definable and observable only through their interaction with other systems.
Permalink to quote #3
Related quotes
Physics is to be regarded not so much as the study of something a priori given, but rather as the development of methods of ordering and surveying human experi…
Niels BohrNiels Bohr quote #7 We should therefore, with grace and optimism, embrace NOMA's tough-minded demand: Acknowledge the personal character of these human struggles about morals and …
Stephen Jay GouldStephen Jay Gould quote #1 All our scientific and philosophic ideals are altars to unknown gods.
William JamesWilliam James quote #1