Wouldn't it have been better to change humanity so it no longer desired to destroy itself?
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- It questions whether altering human nature to stop destruction is a good idea.
- In plain terms
- Should we change people so they stop wanting to hurt each other?
- What can you take from it?
- Preventing destruction might require changing what makes us human.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Would a peaceful humanity still be human?
- Is it better to fix behavior or desire?
Another view
Ignoring the question avoids the real problem of violent desire.
More from Orson Scott Card
I will not be tamed, only persuaded. I will not be coerced or led blindly or tricked or bullied - I am willing only to be convinced. If you don't trust your ow…
Permalink to quote #327 If I had taken away the desire for violence then humanity would not have been humanity. Not that human beings need to be violent in order to be human, but if y…
Permalink to quote #329 Permanence was always an illusion, and love was just the disguise that lovers wore to hide the death of their union from each other for a while.
Permalink to quote #326
Related quotes
If I had taken away the desire for violence then humanity would not have been humanity. Not that human beings need to be violent in order to be human, but if y…
Orson Scott CardOrson Scott Card quote #329 There are no evils in Nature, there are only evils of Man.
Friedensreich HundertwasserFriedensreich Hundertwasser quote #2 There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people for a purpose which is unattainable.
Howard ZinnHoward Zinn quote #3