It tackles a wonderful subject without preening, and brings it off unassertively - so unassertively that the movie is in danger of being overlooked. (Variety has already dismissed it as something 'for a very limited audience.') We're getting to the point where the press assumes that movie audiences won't be willing to bring anything to a picture, and warns them off.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Kael praises a modest film but worries the press assumes audiences lack engagement.
- In plain terms
- The press underestimates audiences and ignores good low-key films.
- What can you take from it?
- Audiences are capable of more than the press assumes.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- What does the press owe audiences?
- Why ignore quiet films?
Another view
Not all films deserve equal attention.
More from Pauline Kael
If I never saw another fistfight or car chase or Doberman attack, I wouldn't have any feeling of loss. And that goes for Rottweilers, too.
Permalink to quote #41 Since I have an aversion to movies in which people say grace at the dinner table (not to the practice but to how movies use it to establish the moral strength …
Permalink to quote #43 Unlike storybook heroes and heroines but like many actual heroes and heroines, she was something of a social outcast. (As Simone Weil noted, it was the people …
Permalink to quote #40
Related quotes
People who are just getting 'seriously interested' in film always ask a critic, 'Why don't you talk about technique and 'the visuals' more?' The answer is that…
Pauline KaelPauline Kael quote #14 I've never gotten anything out of his movies. They have felt constructed, faux intellectual and completely dead. Cinematographically uninteresting and infinite…
Ingmar BergmanIngmar Bergman quote #48 The movie delights me with its cocky confidence that the audience can keep up. Primer is a film for nerds, geeks, brainiacs, Academic Decathlon winners, progra…
Roger EbertRoger Ebert quote #75