People who are just getting 'seriously interested' in film always ask a critic, 'Why don't you talk about technique and 'the visuals' more?' The answer is that American movie technique is generally more like technology and it usually isn't very interesting.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Audiences ask about technique, but Kael argues American film technique is often just functional technology rather than art.
- In plain terms
- People ask about visuals, but Kael says American film technique is mostly boring technology.
- What can you take from it?
- Technique is often just function disguised as art.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Why do audiences care about technique?
- Is technology ever art in film?
Another view
Visuals can be artistic even if technique is functional.
More from Pauline Kael
Movies make hash of the schoolmarm's approach of how well the artist fulfilled his intentions. Whatever the original intention of the writers and director, it …
Permalink to quote #13 The craftsmanship that Hollywood has always used as a selling point not only doesn't have much to do with art - the expressive use of techniques - it probably …
Permalink to quote #15 Audiences who have been forced to wade through the thick middle-class padding of more expensively made movies to get to the action enjoy the nose-thumbing at '…
Permalink to quote #12
Related quotes
And for the greatest movie artists where there is a unity of technique and subject, one doesn't need to talk about technique much because it has been subsumed …
Pauline KaelPauline Kael quote #17 Many people say that I don't know how to draw because I don't draw particular forms. When will they understand that execution, drawing and color (in other word…
Paul GauguinPaul Gauguin quote #5 I loved writing about things when I was excited about them. It's not fun writing about bad movies. I used to think it was bad for my skin. It's painful writing…
Pauline KaelPauline Kael quote #6