There's nothing nonsensical about saying that what would evolve if Darwinian selection has its head is something that you don't want to happen. And I could easily imagine trying to go against Darwinism.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- It is logical to argue against certain evolutionary outcomes, showing that rejecting specific aspects of Darwinism is possible.
- In plain terms
- You can oppose Darwinian results without being nonsensical.
- What can you take from it?
- Human values can conflict with natural selection outcomes.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Should we guide evolution?
- Where do values fit in?
Another view
It risks conflating descriptive facts with prescriptive values.
More from Richard Dawkins
I think it is not helpful to apply Darwinian language too widely. Conquest of nation by nation is too distant for Darwinian explanations to be helpful. Darwini…
Permalink to quote #125 You see, if you say something positive like the whole of life - all living things - is descended from a single common ancestor which lived about 4,000 million …
Permalink to quote #127 ... but the dominance hierarchy itself is not something that natural selection favors or disfavors. What natural selection favors or disfavors is the individua…
Permalink to quote #124
Related quotes
I've come to the realization that a lot of our problems are because of a dearth of spiritual values.
Benjamin SpockBenjamin Spock quote #2 But what could be more important than your happiness? It's said that an authoritarian moral code is necessary to protect society. But who is society? Isn't it …
Harry BrowneHarry Browne quote #5 The doctrines of Calvinism involved a reversal of values with which Arnold became increasingly concerned. Work had always been a curse and a means, but it had …
Lionel TrillingLionel Trilling quote #9