But you cannot have an unnatural welfare state, unless you also have unnatural birth control, otherwise the end result will be misery even greater than that which obtains in nature.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Attempting to create welfare without controlling population size leads to suffering worse than natural conditions due to resource scarcity.
- In plain terms
- Welfare without birth control causes worse suffering than nature.
- What can you take from it?
- Social planning must account for population limits to be sustainable.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Can welfare exist without limits?
- How do we balance rights and resources?
Another view
It assumes population control is the only solution to resource scarcity.
More from Richard Dawkins
The truth is that all examples of child protection and parental care, and all associated bodily organs ... are examples of the working in nature of the kin-sel…
Permalink to quote #27 ... leaders who forbid their followers to use effective contraceptive methods ... express a preference for 'natural' methods of population limitation, and a na…
Permalink to quote #29 It is normally possible to be much more certain who your children are than who your brothers are. And you can be more certain still who you yourself are!
Permalink to quote #26
Related quotes
How much longer, for instance, can we continue to crowd more and more people into this world? How much longer can we afford to wage senseless, destructive wars…
Leo J. RyanLeo J. Ryan quote #2 Since the state must necessarily provide subsistence for the criminal poor while undergoing punishment, not to do the same for the poor who have not offended i…
John Stuart MillJohn Stuart Mill quote #3 Thee might observe incidentally that if the state paid for child-bearing it might and ought to require a medical certificate that the parents were such as to g…
Bertrand RussellBertrand Russell quote #4