It has become almost a cliche to remark that nobody boasts of ignorance of literature, but it is socially acceptable to boast ignorance of science and proudly claim incompetence in mathematics.
About this quote
- What does it mean?
- Society accepts claiming ignorance in science or math but views literary ignorance as shameful.
- In plain terms
- It is okay to be bad at math but not to not read books.
- What can you take from it?
- Science literacy should be valued as much as literature.
Where it applies
Putting it to work
Questions to consider
- Which ignorance is more shameful?
- Why value one over the other?
Another view
Some argue literature teaches essential human skills that science does not.
More from Richard Dawkins
For the first half of geological time our ancestors were bacteria. Most creatures still are bacteria, and each one of our trillions of cells is a colony of bac…
Permalink to quote #62 If you want to do evil, science provides the most powerful weapons to do evil; but equally, if you want to do good, science puts into your hands the most power…
Permalink to quote #64 You could give Aristotle a tutorial. And you could thrill him to the core of his being. Aristotle was an encyclopedic polymath, an all time intellect. Yet not …
Permalink to quote #61
Related quotes
Our rulers: politicians, 'diplomats', bankers, priests of every description, economists, lawyers, etc. and the majority of teachers ... ignorant of modern scie…
Alfred KorzybskiAlfred Korzybski quote #10 Without books, God is silent, justice dormant, natural science at a stand, philosophy lame, letters dumb, and all things involved in darkness.
Thomas V. BartholinThomas V. Bartholin quote #1 If they leave college thinking, as they usually do, that science offers a full, accurate, and literal description of man and Nature; if they think scientific r…
Jacques BarzunJacques Barzun quote #4