Skip to content
quotesby

9 Richard Dawkins Quotes on Skepticism

Richard Dawkins quotes on skepticism

  1. The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.

    Permalink to quote #10
  2. It's been suggested that if the super-naturalists really had the powers they claim, they'd win the lottery every week. I prefer to point out that they could also win a Nobel Prize for discovering fundamental physical forces hitherto unknown to science. Either way, why are they wasting their talents doing party turns on television? By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.

    Permalink to quote #67
  3. We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.

    Permalink to quote #78
  4. We should be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brain falls out.

    Permalink to quote #89
  5. It is often said, mainly by the 'no-contests', that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?

    Permalink to quote #99
  6. We should take astrology seriously. No, I don't mean we should believe in it. I am talking about fighting it seriously instead of humoring it as a piece of harmless fun.

    Permalink to quote #106
  7. There's this thing called being so open-minded your brains drop out.

    Permalink to quote #107
  8. Scorpio could go retrograde up Uranus and it wouldn't make any difference.

    Permalink to quote #111
  9. Paranormal phenomena have a habit of going away whenever they are tested under rigorous conditions. This is why the ?740,000 reward of James Randi, offered to anyone who can demonstrate a paranormal effect under proper scientific controls, is safe. Why don't the television editors insist on some equivalently rigorous test? Could it be that they believe the alleged paranormal powers would evaporate and bang go the ratings?

    Permalink to quote #113