Skip to content
quotesby

About this quote

What does it mean?
The reviewer likens a plot to King Lear’s complaint about being toys for the gods, suggesting the film’s cruelty is gratuitous.
In plain terms
The movie’s plot feels like unnecessary suffering for entertainment.
What can you take from it?
Stories that glorify cruelty can feel morally empty.

Where it applies

  • when a film shows gratuitous violence
  • in discussing adaptations of classic themes

Putting it to work

  • highlight ethical concerns
  • compare to literary sources

Questions to consider

  • Why do some films rely on gratuitous violence?
  • How effective is classical allusion in modern reviews?

Another view

The comparison may be obscure to readers unfamiliar with King Lear.

More from Roger Ebert

  1. This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie does…

    Permalink to quote #18
  2. Little Indian, Big City is one of the worst movies ever made. I detested every moronic minute of it...if you, under any circumstances, see Little Indian, Big C…

    Permalink to quote #20
  3. Dirty Love wasn't written and directed, it was committed. Here is a film so pitiful, it doesn't rise to the level of badness. It is hopelessly incompetent... I…

    Permalink to quote #17

Related quotes

  1. I find it amoral if you're making a movie where the problem is solved with a guy standing in the back of pickup truck firing a machine at the bad guys. The mor…

    David FincherDavid Fincher quote #7
  2. Violence is, of course, alien to our ideals.

    Vladimir LeninVladimir Lenin quote #1
  3. If you are allowed to smack children, you should be allowed to smack geriatrics as well because they are just as much of a nuisance as children, if not more.

    Jack DeeJack Dee quote #1